Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conference Series Events with over 1000+ Conferences, 1000+ Symposiums
and 1000+ Workshops on Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business.

Explore and learn more about Conference Series : World's leading Event Organizer

Back

Sefater Gbashi

Sefater Gbashi

University of Johannesburg, South Africa

Title: Development and validation of a pressurized hot water extraction method for the extraction of aflatoxin B1 in maize

Biography

Biography: Sefater Gbashi

Abstract

Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1), the most potent naturally occurring carcinogen has become increasingly worrisome because of its proliferated contamination of various agricultural commodities worldwide. To quantify it like other mycotoxins in various food and feed commodities, many techniques applied in its extraction have the demerits of being time consuming, expensive and involving large volumes of organic solvents that are often toxic and environmentally unfriendly. It was therefore imperative to look for an alternative method that addresses these mishaps, and pressurized hot water extraction (PHWE) seem very promising in this regard. In this study, we developed and validated a PHWE method for the extraction of AFB1 from maize and subsequent analysis on HPLC. Results obtained revealed that PHWE is suitable for the efficient extraction of AFB1 from maize, with recovery rates ranging from 37 to 128%. Variation of the extraction temperature (50, 100 and 150áµ’C) and solvent composition (0, 20, 40 and 60% methanol) positively enhanced the extractability of AFB1 as both temperature and solvent composition increased. Multivariate statistical modeling of our data using the central composite design response surface methodology (CCD-RSM) generated a model that fits the data well (R2=0.9746). Accordingly, it was possible to establish the optimum extraction conditions for the recovery of AFB1. The optimized conditions (based on acceptable recovery rate, minimal temperature and methanol composition) was 100áµ’C and 40% methanol at a recovery rate of 116%. The recovery rates of the optimized PHWE method compared favorably with conventional extraction methods. Subsequent validation of the optimized method showed acceptable values for accuracy or recovery rate (1167%), linearity (%RSD 0.93) and repeatability (%RSD 1.63). In overall, prospects of PHWE as a suitable, cost-effective and greener alternative to traditional techniques of AFB1 extraction is highly promising.